Nanopore and Big Data: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:36, 23 April 2015

Thesis: We should get into the nanopore market.

who are the players ( Nanopore manufactures )

Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/
Illumina , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing ( http://www.illumina.com/ )
http://www.454.com/

Stregnth

Weakness

Oportunity

Threat

Home work:

blogs:

news release:

research clues:

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 * Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/
+* Illumina  , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing ( http://www.illumina.com/ )
+* http://www.454.com/
 [[SWOT]]
+'''Stregnth'''
 * Big data mating
@@ Line 12: / Line 16: @@
 * Training?
 * Maintanace / Manged place
-* CLoud offering
+* Cloud offering
 '''Weakness'''
@@ Line 18: / Line 22: @@
 * long lead times , long sales cycles.
 * specialized knowledge
+*
+'''Oportunity'''
+*
+* canada does lots of genetic research.
+'''Threat'''
+* quagmired.
+* long lead times
+* poor margin
+* incumbent owns vertical
+*
+Home work:
+* who ar the clients?
+* how long are lead times?
+* what do margins look like?
+* is there a managed play?
+* studio cloud like dedicated DC?
 *
+== references  ==
+blogs:
+[https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/thoughts-on-oxford-nanopores-minion-mobile-dna-sequencer/ Thoughts on Oxford Nanopore’s MinION mobile DNA sequencer ]
+[https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/nanopore-wars/ Nanopore wars]
+news release:
+http://newmediacanada.ca/article.php?id_article=10789
+http://isis-innovation.com/success-stories/gene-sequencing-oxford-nanopore-technologies/
+http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/feb/17/dna-machine-human-sequencing ( 2012 )
+research clues:
+http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-243635742.html