Nanopore and Big Data: Difference between revisions
From Federal Burro of Information
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/ | * Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/ | ||
* Illumina , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing ( | |||
[[SWOT]] | [[SWOT]] | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* studio cloud like dedicated DC? | * studio cloud like dedicated DC? | ||
* | * | ||
== references == | |||
[Thoughts on Oxford Nanopore’s MinION mobile DNA sequencer https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/thoughts-on-oxford-nanopores-minion-mobile-dna-sequencer/] | |||
Revision as of 01:57, 22 April 2015
Thesis: We should get into the nanopore market.
who are the players ( Nanopore manufactures )
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/
- Illumina , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing (
Stregnth
- Big data mating
- Margins?
- Sales cycle?
- Training?
- Maintanace / Manged place
- CLoud offering
Weakness
- long lead times , long sales cycles.
- specialized knowledge
'Opertunity
- canada does lots of genetic research.
Home work:
- who ar the clients?
- how long are lead times?
- what do margins look like?
- is there a managed play?
- studio cloud like dedicated DC?
references
[Thoughts on Oxford Nanopore’s MinION mobile DNA sequencer https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/thoughts-on-oxford-nanopores-minion-mobile-dna-sequencer/]
