Nanopore and Big Data: Difference between revisions
From Federal Burro of Information
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/ | * Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/ | ||
* Illumina , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing ( http://www.illumina.com/ ) | * Illumina , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing ( http://www.illumina.com/ ) | ||
* http://www.454.com/ | |||
[[SWOT]] | [[SWOT]] | ||
Revision as of 14:04, 23 April 2015
Thesis: We should get into the nanopore market.
who are the players ( Nanopore manufactures )
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/
- Illumina , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing ( http://www.illumina.com/ )
- http://www.454.com/
Stregnth
- Big data mating
- Margins?
- Sales cycle?
- Training?
- Maintanace / Manged place
- Cloud offering
Weakness
- long lead times , long sales cycles.
- specialized knowledge
Oportunity
- canada does lots of genetic research.
Threat
- quagmired.
- long lead times
- poor margin
- incumbent owns vertical
Home work:
- who ar the clients?
- how long are lead times?
- what do margins look like?
- is there a managed play?
- studio cloud like dedicated DC?
