Nanopore and Big Data: Difference between revisions

From Federal Burro of Information
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
== references  ==
== references  ==


[Thoughts on Oxford Nanopore’s MinION mobile DNA sequencer https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/thoughts-on-oxford-nanopores-minion-mobile-dna-sequencer/]
[https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/thoughts-on-oxford-nanopores-minion-mobile-dna-sequencer/ Thoughts on Oxford Nanopore’s MinION mobile DNA sequencer ]
 
[https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/nanopore-wars/ Nanopore wars]

Revision as of 01:58, 22 April 2015

Thesis: We should get into the nanopore market.

who are the players ( Nanopore manufactures )

  • Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/
  • Illumina , was in an agreement with nanopore and that's been broken off. they are going to do their own thing (

SWOT

Stregnth

  • Big data mating
  • Margins?
  • Sales cycle?
  • Training?
  • Maintanace / Manged place
  • CLoud offering

Weakness

  • long lead times , long sales cycles.
  • specialized knowledge

'Opertunity

  • canada does lots of genetic research.


Home work:

  • who ar the clients?
  • how long are lead times?
  • what do margins look like?
  • is there a managed play?
  • studio cloud like dedicated DC?


references

Thoughts on Oxford Nanopore’s MinION mobile DNA sequencer

Nanopore wars