Architecture and IT: Difference between revisions
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
[[Image:phases-w-interiors.png]] | [[Image:phases-w-interiors.png]] | ||
* https://www.archtoolbox.com/representation/specifications/project-planning-and-scheduling.html | |||
** got notes on critical path | |||
[[image:critical-path-method-diagram.png]] | |||
== Further reading == | == Further reading == |
Revision as of 16:57, 9 January 2018
I think that IT could and should learn from other industries.
I firmly belie that IT has a lot fo learning to do.
There are mature operations out there. but I have a lot of learning to do.
So I look at IT through the lense of other insdusties
Here I will look at it through Architecture.
An old and large industru.
some things are the same , some things are different.
- Architecture is regulated IT is not.
- architecutre has lots of zero, most of the time IT does not. ~1 million $ versus ~10k $ roughly for a sense of scale.
The pattern of behavior is different also.
architecutre has large teams of specialist.
IT has smaller teams and althoguht there are specialist, often there is a lone specialis who does a job, for exmaple one "enterprise architect" , one DBA, one network person.
arhcitecture doens't involve itself with on going aspect after build as much as IT. IT has support depeartments, architect typically walk away from builds after build is done. LEED changes that. But for the most part this is true.
so IT does the architecture owrk, but it also does the janitorial work.
Timelines and planning
- https://www.archtoolbox.com/representation/specifications/project-planning-and-scheduling.html
- got notes on critical path
Further reading
Design Assist https://www.bdcnetwork.com/design-assist-way-really-fly-aia-course
Information architecture , http://journalofia.org/volume3/issue2/03-resmini/ loosely related :P