Change Management: Difference between revisions
From Federal Burro of Information
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "== Dates == * submited * approved * tested - start / end * implementation schedule == People == * owner * stakeholders * approver") |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* stakeholders | * stakeholders | ||
* approver | * approver | ||
== Challenges == | |||
; Q: How do you reduce the risk of changes? | |||
: A: Testing. | |||
* But on prod data? | |||
* On prod versions ? | |||
How do you make decision making robust wrt to how to move forward? | |||
1. Ensure that you do not depend on a single person to make a call. More than one person needs to be able to "work out" the change. | |||
2. Do work to ensure that teams not individuals are capable of reasonably critiquing changes. If you only have one expert and a bunch of rubber stampers then you don't have a robust desciion making process. | |||
== Also See == | |||
* [[Effecting Change in an Organization]] |
Latest revision as of 12:54, 9 August 2021
Dates
- submited
- approved
- tested - start / end
- implementation schedule
People
- owner
- stakeholders
- approver
Challenges
- Q
- How do you reduce the risk of changes?
- A: Testing.
- But on prod data?
- On prod versions ?
How do you make decision making robust wrt to how to move forward?
1. Ensure that you do not depend on a single person to make a call. More than one person needs to be able to "work out" the change.
2. Do work to ensure that teams not individuals are capable of reasonably critiquing changes. If you only have one expert and a bunch of rubber stampers then you don't have a robust desciion making process.